ACI

Metadata

International Journal of Business and Society, Volume 18, Issue 2, 2017, pp. 311-328

View at publiser

English

Enterprise risk management, performance measurement systems and organizational performance in Malaysian public listed firms

Rasid S.Z.A. *¹, Mokhber M.¹, Tan G.-G.¹, Mohd-Zamil N.A.¹, Golshan N.²

Abstract :

There has been a call for integrating a strategic performance measurement system and enterprise risk management (ERM) as a proposed best practice for risk management. This study examines the effects of ERM and performance measurement systems (PMS) on organizational performance. In addition, this study also examines the effects of a linked ERM-PMS tool on organizational performance. The research method involved administering an online questionnaire survey to 196 public listed firms. The respondents were the head of risk management department of the firms. In the case of ERM and PMS effects on organizational performance, the result of simple linear regression supported the research hypotheses. However the results from the moderated multiple regression which was employed to test the joint effect of ERM and PMS on organizational performance did not support the research hypothesis. Based on the study results it is recommended that firms may practice ERM and PMS separately rather than linking them together, since their integration may complicate the PMS framework. © 2017, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak. All rights reserved.

Keywords : Balanced scorecard,Enterprise risk management,Organizational performance,Performance measurement system

Subject Area : Business and International Management Economics and Econometrics Finance Strategy and Management

Reference (73)

1. Proposing a conceptual framework to measure the performance of Enterprise Risk Management from an empirical study of four major European insurers

Acharyya M.

(2007)

2. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions

Aiken L.S., West S.G., Reno R.R.

(1991)

3. Moving from performance measurement to performance management

Amaratunga D., Baldry D.

Facilities(2002), Volume 20, pp. 217-223

doi.10.1108/02632770210426701

4. Risk and performance management: Are they easy partners?

Arena M., Arnaboldi M.

Management Research Review(2014), Volume 37, Issue 2, pp. 152-166

doi.10.1108/MRR-08-2012-0180

5. Coordinating Risk Management and Performance Measurement.

Ballou B., Heitger D.

(2011)

6. Integrating the balanced scorecard and enterprise risk management

Ballou B., Brewer P.C., Heitger D.L.

Internal Auditing-Boston-Warren Gorham And Lamont Incorporated-(2006), Volume 21, Issue 3, pp. 34-38

7. Enterprising views of risk management: Businesses can use ERM to manage a wide variety of risks

Banham R.

Journal of Accountancy(2004), Volume 197, Issue 6, pp. 14-20

8. An empirical investigation of an incentive plan that includes nonfinancial performance measures

Banker R.D., Potter G., Srinivasan D.

The Accounting Review(2000), Volume 75, Issue 1, pp. 65-92

doi.10.2308/accr.2000.75.1.65

URL : http://aaapubs.org/loi/accr/

9. Performance measures in supply chain management

Beamon B.M.

Proceedings of the 1996 Conference on Agile and Intelligent Manufacturing Systems(1996)

10. Enterprise risk management: An empirical analysis of factors associated with the extent of implementation

Beasley M.S., Clune R., Hermanson D.R.

Journal of Accounting and Public Policy(2005), Volume 24, Issue 6, pp. 521-531

doi.10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2005.10.001

11. The impact of enterprise risk management on the internal audit function

Beasley M.S., Clune R., Hermanson D.R.

(2006)

12. Working hand in hand: Balanced scorecards and enterprise risk management

Beasley M., Chen A., Nunez K., Wright L.

Strategic Finance(2006), Volume 87, Issue 9, pp. 49-55

13. Information conveyed in hiring announcements of senior executives overseeing enterprise-wide risk management processes

Beasley M., Pagach D., Warr R.

Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance(2008), Volume 23, Issue 3, pp. 311-332

14. Risk management in banking

Bessis J.

(2011)

15. The effects of the interactive use of management control systems on product innovation

Bisbe J., Otley D.

Accounting, Organizations and Society(2004), Volume 29, Issue 8, pp. 709-737

doi.10.1016/j.aos.2003.10.010

16. Premium growth, underwriting return and segment analysis

Calandro J., Flynn R.

Measuring Business Excellence(2005), Volume 9, Issue 4, pp. 27-36

doi. 10.1108/13683040510634817

17. An introduction to the enterprise risk scorecard

Calandro J., Lane S.

Measuring Business Excellence(2006), Volume 10, Issue 3, pp. 31-40

doi.10.1108/13683040610685775

18. Overview of Enterprise Risk Management Committee Report

Casualty Actuarial Society (CAS)

(2003)

19. Performance measurement and reward systems, trust, and strategic change

Chenhall R.H., Langfield-Smith K.

Journal of Management Accounting Research(2003), Volume 15, Issue 1, pp. 117-143

20. Decentralization, management accounting system (MAS) information characteristics and their interaction effects on managerial performance: A Singapore study

Chia Y.M.

Journal of Business Finance & Accounting(1995), Volume 22, Issue 6, pp. 811-830

doi.10.1111/j.1468-5957.1995.tb00390.x

21. Understanding the features of performance measurement system: A literature review

Choong K.K.

Measuring Business Excellence(2013), Volume 17, Issue 4, pp. 102-121

doi.10.1108/MBE-05-2012-0031

22. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences

Cohen J.

(1988)

23. Managerial involvement and perceptions of strategy process

Collier N., Fishwick F., Floyd S.W.

Long Range Planning(2004), Volume 37, Issue 1, pp. 67-83

doi.10.1016/j.lrp.2003.11.012

URL : https://www.scopus.com/record/www.elsevier.com/inca/publications/store/3/5/8/

24. Integrated risk management and the role of the risk manager

Colquitt L.L., Hoyt R.E., Lee R.B.

Risk Management and Insurance Review(1999), Volume 2, Issue 3, pp. 43-61

25. Enterprise Risk Management-Integrated Framework.

Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)

(2004)

26. The rise of risk management

Cummins J.D., Phillips R.D., Smith S.D.

Economic review- Federal Reserve bank of Atlanta(1998), Volume 83, Issue 1, pp. 30-40

27. The effect of chief risk officer (CRO) on enterprise risk management (ERM) practices: Evidence from Malaysia

Daud W.N.W., Yazid A.S., Hussin H.M.R.

International Business & Economics Research Journal(2010), Volume 9, Issue 11, pp. 55-64

28. Does the balanced scorecard add value? Empirical evidence on its effect on performance

De Geuser F., Mooraj S., Oyon D.

European Accounting Review(2009), Volume 18, Issue 1, pp. 93-122

doi.10.1080/09638180802481698

29. Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory

Drazin R., Van De Ven A.H.

Administrative science quarterly(1985), Volume 30, Issue 4, pp. 514-539

30. Contingency-based research on management control systems: Categorization by level of complexity

Fisher J.

Journal of Accounting Literature(1995), Volume 14, pp. 24-53

31. Contingency theory, management control systems and firm outcomes: Past results and future directions

Fisher J.G.

Behavioral Research in Accounting(1998), Volume 10, pp. 47-64

32. Enterprise risk management and firm performance: The Italian case

Florio C., Leoni G.

The British Accounting Review(2017), Volume 49, Issue 1, pp. 5-74

doi.10.1016/j.bar.2016.08.003

URL : http://www.elsevier.com/inca/publications/store/6/2/2/8/0/1/index.htt

33. Enterprise risk management and firm performance: A contingency perspective

Gordon L.A., Loeb M.P., Tseng C.Y.

Journal of Accounting and Public Policy(2009), Volume 28, Issue 4, pp. 301-327

doi. 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2009.06.006

34. Multivariate data analysis

Hair J.F., Black W.C., Babin B.J., Anderson R.E.

(2010)

35. Linking balanced scorecard measures to size and market factors: Impact on organizational performance

Hoque Z., James W.

Journal of Management Accounting Research(2000), Volume 12, Issue 1, pp. 1-17

36. The value of enterprise risk management

Hoyt R.E., Liebenberg A.P.

The Journal of Risk and Insurance(2011), Volume 78, Issue 4, pp. 795-822

doi.10.1111/j.1539-6975.2011.01413.x

37. Innovations in performance measurement: Trends and research implications

Ittner C.D., Larcker D.F.

Journal of Management Accounting Research(1998), Volume 10, pp. 205-238

38. The Fifth Pillar of the Balanced Scorecard: Sustainability

Kalender Z.T., Vayvay

Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences(2016), Volume 235, pp. 76-83

39. The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance

Kaplan R.S., Norton D.P.

Harvard business review(1992), Volume 70, Issue 1, pp. 71-79

40. Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system

Kaplan R.S., Norton D.P.

Harvard business review(1996), Volume 74, Issue 1, pp. 75-85

41. Transforming the balanced scorecard from performance measurement to strategic management: Part 1

Kaplan R.S., Norton D.P.

Accounting Horizons(2001), Volume 15, Issue 1, pp. 87-104

doi.10.2308/acch.2001.15.1.87

URL : http://aaapubs.aip.org/getpdf/servlet/GetPDFServlet?filetype=pdf&id=ACHXXX000015000001000087000001&idtype=cvips&prog=normal

42. Offering a Framework for Evaluating the Performance of Project Risk Management System

Khameneh A.H., Taheri A., Ershadi M.

Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences(2016), Volume 226, pp. 82-90

43. The design of organizations

Khandwalla P.N.

(1977)

44. The effect of corporate governance on the use of enterprise risk management: Evidence from Canada

Kleffner A.E., Lee R.B., McGannon B.

Risk Management and Insurance Review(2003), Volume 6, Issue 1, pp. 53-73

45. Enterprise risk management framework and the empirical determinants of its implementation

Lai F.-W., Samad F.A.

Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Business and Economics Research.(2010)

46. The determinants of enterprise risk management: Evidence from the appoitnment of chief risk officers

Liebenberg A.P., Hoyt R.E.

Risk Management and Insurance Review(2003), Volume 6, Issue 1, pp. 37-52

doi.10.1111/1098-1616.00019/

47. Risk management: Protect and maximize stakeholder value.

Maziol S.

(2009)

48. The connection between performance measurement and risk management

McWhorter L.B., Matherly M., Frizzell D.M.

Strategic Finance-Montvale(2006), Volume 87, Issue 8, pp. 50-55

49. Market competition, management accounting systems and business unit performance

Mia L., Clarke B.

Management Accounting Research(1999), Volume 10, Issue 2, pp. 137-158

doi.10.1006/mare.1998.0097

URL : http://www.elsevier.com/inca/publications/store/6/2/2/9/1/1/index.htt

50. Enterprise risk management- An analytic approach

Miccolis J., Shah S.

(2000)

51. Aligning enterprise risk management with strategy through the BSC: The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi approach

Nagumo T.

Balanced Scorecard Report, September-October(2005), pp. 3-6

52. Performance measurement system design: A literature review and research agenda

Neely A., Gregory M., Platts K.

International Journal of Operations & Production Management(2005), Volume 25, Issue 12, pp. 1228-1263

doi.10.1108/01443570510633639

53. Balanced scorecard step-by-step: Maximizing performance and maintaining results

Niven P.R.

(2002)

54. Enterprise Risk Management Models

Olson D.L., Wu D.

(2010)

doi. 10.1007/978-3-642-11474-8

URL : http://www.springerlink.com/openurl.asp?genre=book&isbn=978-3-642-11473-1

55. Performance management: A framework for management control systems research

Otley D.

Management Accounting Research(1999), Volume 10, Issue 4, pp. 363-382

doi.10.1006/mare.1999.0115

56. The characteristics of firms that hire chief risk officers

Pagach D., Warr R.

Journal of Risk and Insurance(2011), Volume 78, Issue 1, pp. 185-211

doi.10.1111/j.1539-6975.2010.01378.x

57. The Use of Balanced Scorecard Measures in Executive Incentives and Firm Performance.

Pollanen R., Xi K.K.

(2011)

58. From risk management to ERM

Rochette M.

Journal of Risk Management in Financial Institutions(2009), Volume 2, Issue 4, pp. 394-408

59. Measuring the cost of risk

Sammer J.

Business Finance, March(2006), pp. 49-52

60. The use of the Balanced Scorecard in Portugal: Evolution and effects on management changes in Portuguese large companies

Saraiva H.I.B., Alves M.C.G.

Tékhne(2015), Volume 13, Issue 2, pp. 82-94

61. Risk and the balanced scorecard

Scholey C.

CMA Management(2006), Volume 32, pp. 32-35

62. Malaysian Code on Corporate Governance.

Securities Commission Malaysia (SCM)

(2012)

63. Corporate Value of Enterprise Risk Management: The Next Step in Business Management

Segal S.

(2011), Volume 3

64. Research methods for business: A skill building approach

Sekaran U.

(2006)

65. Research methods for business: A skill building approach

Sekaran U., Bougie R.

(2010)

66. Risk, regulation and the role of management accounting and control in UK financial services.

Soin K.

(2005)

67. The Coefficient of Determination, R-squared

Stat 501

(2017)

URL : https://onlinecourses.science.psu.edu/stat501

68. The structure of balanced scorecards: Empirical evidence from Norwegian manufacturing industry

Stemsrudhagen J.I.

Studies in Managerial and Financial Accounting: Performance Measurement and Managerial Control: Superior Organizational Performancce(2004), pp. 303-321

69. The effects of perceived business uncertainty, external consultants and risk management on organisational outcomes

Subramaniam N., Collier P., Phang M., Burke G.

Journal of Accounting &Organizational Change(2011), Volume 7, Issue 2, pp. 132-157

doi.10.1108/18325911111139671

70. Does the Balanced Scorecard make a difference to the strategy development process?

Tapinos E., Dyson R.G., Meadows M.

Journal of the Operational Research Society(2011), Volume 62, Issue 5, pp. 888-899

doi.10.1057/jors.2010.99

71. An enhanced data-analytic framework for integrating risk management and performance management

Thekdi S., Aven T.

Reliability Engineering & System Safety(2016), Volume 156, pp. 277-287

doi.10.1016/j.ress.2016.07.010

72. Linking risk management to strategic controls: A case study of Tesco plc

Woods M.

International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management(2007), Volume 7, Issue 8, pp. 1074-1088

doi.10.1504/IJRAM.2007.015295

73. A Strategic Framework For Value Enhancing Enterprise Risk Management

Woon L.F., Azizan N.A., Samad M.F.A.

Journal of Global Business and Economics(2011), Volume 2, Issue 1, pp. 23-48

Metadata

Enterprise risk management, performance measurement systems and organizational performance in Malaysian public listed firms

Reference (73)

Cited (0)